CITRON & SOLOVE / 2022

Privacy harm explorer

Change the facts of a fictional scenario. See which interests are affected—and why losing money is only part of the picture.

Based on Privacy Harms, 102 B.U. L. Rev. 793 (2022). Examples and mappings are Law Vision’s interpretations.

Enable JavaScript to use the interactive explorer. The source article is linked above.

Source, interpretation & scope

Danielle Keats Citron & Daniel J. Solove, Privacy Harms, 102 Boston University Law Review 793 (2022). The explorer follows the downloaded GLTR reading. The authors’ typology appears in Figure 1 and Part V (pp. 830–861); recurring small harms, risk and societal effects are discussed in Part II (pp. 816–819); their enforcement proposal is in Part III (pp. 819–826).

The seven categories and named subtypes come from the article. Definitions here are attributed paraphrases. Scenarios, fact selections, mappings and study questions are original educational interpretations, not the authors’ examples or findings about real people. The categories do not form a severity score or an exhaustive test. The article’s discussion of case law and its proposals are dated to publication.

No real incident details are requested. Choices stay in memory during this page session and reset on a full reload; the explorer sends no choices to a server. Source links open the publisher’s PDF at the cited printed page. The vault PDF includes an additional cover sheet, so its PDF page numbers differ from the publisher’s.

Read the published article · Author’s repository record